An Unbiased View of responsibility of finder of goods case laws
An Unbiased View of responsibility of finder of goods case laws
Blog Article
However, the above observation is without prejudice for the legal rights on the parties, arising out in the over marriage from the pair, if any, pending before the competent court of law. Read more
Article 199 from the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other satisfactory remedy is provided by law." It is actually properly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust offered remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether These remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is often a free and democratic place, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; When the parents of your boy or girl usually do not approve of such inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they're able to do if they could Minimize off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this sort of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman who is a major, the few is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who provides these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to job by instituting criminal proceedings through the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against these types of person(s) as provided by legislation.
When the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may perhaps dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had an opportunity to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may perhaps allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is normally only accomplished if the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. During the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence as well as the petitioner company responded to the allegations as such they were well aware about the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
Unfortunately, that wasn't correct. Just two months after being placed with the Roe family, the Roe’s son told his parents that the boy had molested him. The boy was arrested two times later, and admitted to having sexually molested the few’s son several times.
These past decisions are called "case law", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Allow the decision stand"—would be the principle by which judges are bound to such past decisions, drawing on set up judicial authority to formulate their positions.
When the state court hearing the case reviews the law, he finds that, though it mentions large multi-tenant properties in certain context, it can be actually really obscure about whether the 90-working day provision applies to all landlords. The judge, based over the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held on the ninety-day notice necessity, and rules in Stacy’s favor.
The court system is then tasked with interpreting the regulation when it's unclear the way it relates to any presented situation, usually rendering judgments based within the intent of lawmakers along with the circumstances with the case at hand. These types of decisions become a guide for long run similar cases.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to the main case, It's also a effectively-proven proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is subject towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.
This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in the method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding reached through the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. Should the summary or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court might interfere with the conclusion or even the finding and mould the relief to really make it appropriate towards the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-value the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. Within the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified with the decision of your Supreme Court while in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The regulation enjoins the police to get scrupulously fair towards the offender along with the Magistracy is to make certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and also from other courts However they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The plenty of this power casts an obligation on the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for the crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar problem. When they sue read more their landlord, the court must make use of the previous court’s decision in applying the regulation. This example of case legislation refers to two cases listened to within the state court, at the same level.
156 . Const. P. 1015/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Saleem Jehangir V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's also important to note that neither seniority nor promotion would be the vested right of the civil servant, therefore, neither any seniority nor any promotion can be claimed or granted without the actual length of service on account of vested rights. The purpose of prescribing a particular duration of service for starting to be entitled to get thought of for promotion to a higher quality, of course, is not really without logic given that the officer that is in the beginning inducted to some particular post needs to provide to the said post to gain experience to hold the next higher post also to serve the public within a befitting manner.
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” aren't binding, but may be used as persuasive authority, which is to offer substance into the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.